
Two hires failed before I blamed the job description
Two hires failed the same role in under a year. The candidates were not the problem; the spec was. Why the third hire only works after you rewrite the job.
Angle
11 posts

Two hires failed the same role in under a year. The candidates were not the problem; the spec was. Why the third hire only works after you rewrite the job.

She shipped on time every quarter for two years. At her review, the CEO called her 'not visible enough.'

She was marketing's best IC. Eight months after the VP promotion, the function had stopped shipping. Why the IC-to-manager step fails so often.

Weekly thirty-minute slots with seven directs for two years. The first month I deleted them, nobody noticed. The second month, the team got faster.

Thirty minutes a week for eighteen months, opening with the Q3 rollout. The manager had built a standing meeting that wasn't management.

The title was real. The headcount under her was zero. She'd been promoted to run a function she was the only person inside of.

Forty-seven reviews. Forty-three 'meets,' four 'exceeds,' zero 'below.' The cycle was a calibration exercise that had stopped calibrating.

Sixty days of check-ins and three signed documents produced an outcome the team called on day one. The plan wasn't improvement — it was a record for the file.

He was the strongest engineer on the team. You made him a manager. Six months later he's unhappy, the team is slower, and you've got a tier-three manager.

He gave the same person the same feedback for fourteen months. The team learned that consequences were a rumor.

A new hire who stops asking questions in week three isn't adapted. They've started running the math on leaving.